<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steiger in BW on Joi Ito and Creative Commons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.millionsofus.com/blog/2008/08/25/steiger-in-bw-on-joi-ito-and-creative-commons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://millionsofus.com/blog/2008/08/25/steiger-in-bw-on-joi-ito-and-creative-commons/</link>
	<description>Social Media Agency creating movements for Brands - Millions of Us</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  8 Feb 2012 09:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prokofy Neva</title>
		<link>http://millionsofus.com/blog/2008/08/25/steiger-in-bw-on-joi-ito-and-creative-commons/#comment-115642</link>
		<dc:creator>Prokofy Neva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://millionsofus.com/blog/?p=521#comment-115642</guid>
		<description>Well, it's good that Reuben got the exposure here, but...what are you saying, exactly?

Joi Ito recently called himself, while speaking on a video-taped panel, "a venture communist".
And he's not kidding. This model is not one that works for most businesses. Creative Commons is 
basically a clever shill to get you to give your works away for free, and try to attain Zen-like
detachment about the fact that others may gain commercial benefit.

But...it's not a way for YOU to make money. Among the elaborate CC licenses, there isn't one that says
"You can copy this if you pay me on PayPal, click here." CC *doesn't* make it easy for artists to use these licenses *to make a buck*. And in that sense, it really is a kind of ruse, trying to ween people away from capitalism to idealistic communist-like Internet utopias where they are berated and hectored and told that they should "get a different business model" and "generate the 8 generatives" by...customizing. Or...selling a t-shirt on top of a music clip. Or something.

Do you have some notion of *giving away* your IP_protected celebrity virtual goods business? Isn't the idea to sell them? I truly wonder why you are celebrating Joi Ito and CC given that your model appears to be very different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s good that Reuben got the exposure here, but&#8230;what are you saying, exactly?</p>
<p>Joi Ito recently called himself, while speaking on a video-taped panel, &#8220;a venture communist&#8221;.<br />
And he&#8217;s not kidding. This model is not one that works for most businesses. Creative Commons is<br />
basically a clever shill to get you to give your works away for free, and try to attain Zen-like<br />
detachment about the fact that others may gain commercial benefit.</p>
<p>But&#8230;it&#8217;s not a way for YOU to make money. Among the elaborate CC licenses, there isn&#8217;t one that says<br />
&#8220;You can copy this if you pay me on PayPal, click here.&#8221; CC *doesn&#8217;t* make it easy for artists to use these licenses *to make a buck*. And in that sense, it really is a kind of ruse, trying to ween people away from capitalism to idealistic communist-like Internet utopias where they are berated and hectored and told that they should &#8220;get a different business model&#8221; and &#8220;generate the 8 generatives&#8221; by&#8230;customizing. Or&#8230;selling a t-shirt on top of a music clip. Or something.</p>
<p>Do you have some notion of *giving away* your IP_protected celebrity virtual goods business? Isn&#8217;t the idea to sell them? I truly wonder why you are celebrating Joi Ito and CC given that your model appears to be very different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

